
This year in class we have discussed story telling and how people choose to deliver the things they see. After watching the Chicago Bears unfortunate loss to the Oakland Raiders I noticed that people chose to tell very different stories of the game.
Jay Cohen of the Associated Press in an article described Caleb Hanie's (The Quarterback replacement for the injured Jay Cutler) performance as a "shaky trip to the Black Hole". Later he also discusses the "flubbed" spike at the end.
I find it very interesting how sports analysts only have two opinions usually. Either someone preforms spectacularly or they completely failed and have every detail of their game meticulously analyzed for the smallest mistake.
Caleb's so called "flubbed" spike is an example of this. With four seconds left and about fifty yards to go not many veteran QB's could be expected to score, much less a first time back up. A slight mental error ended the game seconds earlier than it normally would have, but if you listen to a lot of people it sounds like the game was lost in that play alone.
Caleb Hanie played well as far as I care, but the message I am trying to get across is how peoples opinions change the way they retell events. I guarantee if we had won in those last seconds all his interceptions would be ignored as first game nerve issues. But he didn't, so now he is being criticized for it .
There are countless other cases of corrupt or biased stories being told. Our own opinions seem to be able to alter the facts in our own minds, the stories we tell can also show our opinions on the topic being discussed.

Unfortunately I think we have. This is one of many posters I was able to find that make our enemies seem more like beasts that need to be slain. There are many more showing buck toothed Chinese men shown as Communists that are taking over the world.